Back to Blog
BacktestingFebruary 1, 20268 min read

Slippage, Fees, and Funding: Why Your Crypto Backtest Lies (and How to Fix It)

Most crypto strategies fail live for one reason: costs. Learn how slippage, spreads, taker fees, and funding rates silently destroy backtests—and how to model them realistically.

V

Vantixs Team

Trading Education

Share:

Slippage, Fees, and Funding: Why Your Crypto Backtest Lies (and How to Fix It)

If your backtest looks amazing and your live results look “fine but worse”… you almost always have a cost-model problem.

Crypto is cost-heavy:

  • wide spreads on alts
  • taker fees when you cross the spread
  • slippage during volatility
  • funding for perpetuals

The 4 costs you must model

1) Fees (maker/taker)

Even “small” fees compound fast with high turnover.

2) Spread

Buying at ask and selling at bid is a cost. Many candle-based sims ignore it.

3) Slippage

Slippage is not constant. It spikes during breakouts and liquidation cascades.

4) Funding (perps)

Funding can flip the economics of a strategy that holds positions for days.

Solution

If you want realistic results, your backtest must include fees + spread + slippage (and funding for perps). If you can’t model them, assume worse and reduce position sizing.

Practical modeling (simple, workable)

  • Fee: fixed maker/taker rate (start with taker)
  • Spread: add a small penalty on entry/exit (bigger for alts)
  • Slippage: base + volatility adjustment (worse in high ATR regimes)
  • Funding: apply funding at funding intervals using historical funding data (or conservative estimate)

Next in the series

#crypto backtesting#slippage#fees#funding rate#spread#backtesting

Ready to Build Your First Trading Bot?

Vantixs gives you 150+ indicators, ML-powered signals, and institutional-grade backtesting—all in a visual drag-and-drop builder.

Related Articles